for who has the island in the heart ...

Marinas: Mayor few downsides ...


The Mayor has sent a comment, below, regarding yesterday's meeting by the Council Committee on the port system with the Civil Engineers OO.MM.

I waited before responding (I counted up to ten ...) because I was not clear if what was written by him a message he wanted to give to "someone" or taken for a ride across the Council Commission and the Community usticese.

We would have preferred that the Mayor was present at that meeting to defend, with conviction, the expectations of all the people who administer and would delegate to the commissioner responsible for other concurrent meetings, because the island is the car driving to port facilities throughout the economy

We would have expected even by the mayor, the appreciation of the skill and perseverance of the Commission was able to demonstrate to Ing. Viviano as designed by him is not practicable and that the only chance of securing the Cove is "retirement" from the village fishermen.

Was not discussed nor Spalmatore (not new port facilities but the COMPLETION of work already exists) or pier cemetery because the mandate of the town council, as the first stage was the safety of Cala Santa Maria.

Peter Bertucci

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

From what I read from the reports of those present, as expected, it is only spoken of safety measures and new port facilities Spalmatore type that is not easy in this period are eligible for funding. The Maritime Civil Engineering works offers an alternative to that approved in the city council that is certainly to protect the environment. Every confidence she competence and experience of the engineer will Viviano although when brought to our attention we will evaluate the project drawing together the usufruibilità especially in terms of roads also

Aldo Messina

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

COMMENT:

From Montecosaro Mariangela Militello

Reading the report of Salvatore Militello emblèe you can 'see that the solution of the elongation Pier Taormina so obviously bad and I would say even dangerous situations for docking in rough waters, has been proposed again, worrying if I would present it again was the GCOM.
Another downside is that once again gives you more 'importance to the landscape, "perfected", as mentioned by Salvatore Militello, and / or Poseidon, rather than the safety of the citizens and vessels.
I'm always the idea that nature plays its benevolent and charitable actions, with respect to human needs, provided directed to the concepts of thrift, respect and style.
Far be it from me from doing controversy, but if we talk in terms of landscape, I wonder what the military judgment of the Superintendent with respect to the building that dominates the island's archaeological museum, or even armed. If I remember correctly, architectural barriers (see art. Usticasape 18/09/2011)! ..
However if we analyze fully the report can not do nothing but applaud and appreciate the work of the Council Committee firmly reiterating its shares and expertise, which I would have expected that the Mayor did with his absence did not support the Commission nor does it represented the demands of citizenship usticese.
It sounds like an ominous omen for the Mayor said in his latest review any assessment of the project design in terms of usufruibilità and viability.
Another small detail is that the Pier Spalmatore and Cemetery are not "new port facilities", but existing works that should and could be improved to give continuity to maritime transport "to" and not "against" the development of the island.
However, if future meetings will be focused on solutions that meet the standards of safety measures, first of all, Poseidon and landscaping are well floating docks that many marinas have, one not far from where I live: the tourist port of Marina Dorian (AN).
I wish you all a fruitful Council Committee believes there will be supported by us with pride.

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

From Palermo Mario Oddo

I willingly leave to others better prepared politically and technically responsible for the undersigned to make assessments and comments on the subject. I add only that I have the impression (if not the certainty) that this whole affair the mayor of Ustica is punctiliously wearing the famous role of "THE FRIEND OF THE JAGUAR", by definition, specific to the younger, "who instead of defend the interests of a friend he sides with his adversary. " There is a matter of debate ...

2 Responses to "port system: Mayor few downsides ..."

  1. Mario Oddo wrote:

    I willingly leave to others better prepared politically and technically responsible for the undersigned to make assessments and comments on the subject. I add only that I have the impression (if not the certainty) that this whole affair the mayor of Ustica is punctiliously wearing the famous role of "THE FRIEND OF THE JAGUAR", by definition, specific to the younger, "who instead of defend the interests of a friend he sides with his adversary. " There is a matter of debate ...

  2. Mariangela Militello wrote:

    Reading the report of Salvatore Militello emblèe you can 'see that the solution of the elongation Pier Taormina so obviously bad and I would say even dangerous situations for docking in rough waters, has been proposed again, worrying if I would present it again was the GCOM.

    Another downside is that once again gives you more 'importance to the landscape, "perfected", as mentioned by Salvatore Militello, and / or Poseidon, rather than the safety of the citizens and vessels.
    I'm always the idea that nature plays its benevolent and charitable actions, with respect to human needs, provided directed to the concepts of thrift, respect and style.

    Far be it from me from doing controversy, but if we talk in terms of landscape, I wonder what the military judgment of the Superintendent with respect to the building that dominates the island's archaeological museum, or even armed. If I remember correctly, architectural barriers (see art. Usticasape 18/09/2011)! ..

    However if we analyze fully the report can not do nothing but applaud and appreciate the work of the Council Committee firmly reiterating its shares and expertise, which I would have expected the mayor who did
    with its absence did not support the Commission nor does it represented the demands of citizenship usticese.

    It sounds like an ominous omen for the Mayor said in his latest review any assessment of the project design in terms of usufruibilità and viability.
    Another small detail is that the Pier Spalmatore and Cemetery are not "new port facilities", but existing works that should and could be improved to give continuity to maritime transport "to" and not "against" the development of the island.

    However, if future meetings will be focused on solutions that meet the standards of safety measures, first of all, Poseidon and landscaping are well floating docks that many marinas have, one not far from where I live: the tourist port of Marina Dorian (AN).
    I wish you all a fruitful Council Committee believes there will be supported by us with pride.

    Mariangela Militello

Leave a Reply

See also: